tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5384531079965582844.post5046968267408732907..comments2023-04-01T08:52:56.387-07:00Comments on Tunnelling through Academia: Making the peer review process publicAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01587264277215819836noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5384531079965582844.post-82184926574276162842013-05-07T21:48:36.341-07:002013-05-07T21:48:36.341-07:00I'm going to, I've been convinced. It doe...I'm going to, I've been convinced. It does still make you 'the few' in the wider sense though as the other journals haven't caught up yet, so the majority of publications out there don't show their history.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01587264277215819836noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5384531079965582844.post-43501886896411140122013-05-07T21:25:33.183-07:002013-05-07T21:25:33.183-07:00Actually, more like 70% of all PeerJ authors have ...Actually, more like 70% of all PeerJ authors have currently chosen to publish their Peer Review history. So I vote you do it too!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11815520433493035416noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5384531079965582844.post-3771641878043400142013-05-07T07:24:30.854-07:002013-05-07T07:24:30.854-07:00Do it!
For what it's worth, publishing your P...Do it!<br /><br />For what it's worth, publishing your PeerJ review history will not put you among "the few who are doing it" -- more than half of PeerJ articles have public reviews.Mike Taylorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06039663158335543317noreply@blogger.com